Isoflurane has been characterized as a distressing agent for rodents, causing both physiologic and behavioral effects. Using a "darkened home cage" has been recommended during CO₂ administration for rodent euthanasia; this is arguably a similar animal experience to anesthetic induction with isoflurane. Based on the premise that rodents perceive red light as darkness via the primary optic tract, we compared physiologic and behavioral markers of stress in 2 inbred strains of mice (C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ) anesthetized with isoflurane in either a red-tinted (dark) induction chamber or a traditional translucent induction chamber. Physiologic stress was assessed based on plasma levels of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and corticosterone. Stress-related behaviors (rearing, face wiping, and jumping) were recorded on video and scored from initiation of induction to loss of consciousness. No significant correlations were found between chamber type and physiologic stress hormones. As compared with the translucent chamber, stress-related behaviors were more frequent in the red-tinted chamber, including: 1) significantly higher rearing frequencies in BALB/cJ mice; 2) higher behavioral stress scores in BALB/cJ and male C57BL/6J mice; and 3) more face wiping behavior when considering all mice combined. These findings suggest that mice do not experience significant alleviation of physiologic indices of stress when anesthetized in a red-tinted induction chamber. Furthermore, isoflurane induction in the red-tinted chamber appeared to increase the expression of stress-related behaviors, particularly in BALB/cJ mice. Based on our findings and a growing body of literature on the unintended effects of red light, we do not recommend using red-tinted chambers for induction of anesthesia in mice.

Light and lighting protocols of animal research facilities are critically important to the outcomes of biomedical research that uses animals. Previous studies from our laboratory showed that the wavelength (color) of light in animal housing areas affects the nocturnal melatonin signal that temporally coordinates circadian rhythms in rodents. Here, we tested the hypothesis that exposure to LED light enriched in the blue-appearing portion (460-480 nm) of the visible spectrum during the light phase (bLAD) influences circadian concentrations of select neuroendocrine hormones in adolescent Sprague–Dawley rats. Male and female rats (4 to 5 wk old) were housed on a novel IVC system under a 12L:12D in either cool-white fluorescent (control, n = 72) or bLAD (experimental, n = 72) lighting. Every third day, body weight and food and water consumption were measured. On Day 30, rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine and terminal collection of arterial blood was performed to quantify serum concentrations of melatonin, corticosterone, insulin, and glucose at 6 circadian time points (0400, 0800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400). As compared with male and female rats housed under cool white fluorescent (CWF) lighting, rats in bLAD lighting showed a 6-fold higher peak in dark phase serum melatonin (P < 0.05). Effects on serum corticosterone were sex dependent, as CWF and bLAD females had significantly higher corticosterone levels than did CWF and bLAD males, respectively. CWF and bLAD females had significantly higher serum glucose overall as compared with males. However, serum insulin was not affected by sex (M or F) or lighting conditions (CWF or bLAD). These data show that housing Sprague–Dawley rats under bLAD lighting conditions increases circadian peaks of melatonin without increasing serum levels of corticosterone, glucose or insulin, indicating less variation of circadian cycling of key neuroendocrine hormones in bLAD-exposed rats.

Bats are known natural reservoirs of several highly pathogenic zoonotic viruses, including Hendra virus, Nipah virus, rabies virus, SARS-like coronaviruses, and suspected ancestral reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The capacity to survive infections of highly pathogenic agents without severe disease, together with many other unique features, makes bats an ideal animal model for studying the regulation of infection, cancer, and longevity, which is likely to translate into human health outcomes. A key factor that limits bat research is lack of breeding bat colonies. To address this need, a captive bat colony was established in Singapore from 19 wild-caught local cave nectar bats. The bats were screened for specific pathogens before the start of captive breeding. Custom-made cages and an optimized diet inclusive of Wombaroo dietary formula, liquid diet, and supplement of fruits enabled the bats to breed prolifically in our facility. Cages are washed daily and disinfected once every fortnight. Bats are observed daily to detect any sick bat or abnormal behavior. In addition, bats undergo a thorough health check once every 3 to 4 mo to check on their overall wellbeing, perform sampling, and document any potential pregnancy. The current colony houses over 80 bats that are successfully breeding, providing a valuable resource for research in Singapore and overseas.

Vivarium husbandry practices are based on performance data and adhere to applicable regulatory guidelines. Refinements in husbandry and optimization of sanitization protocols improve animal wellbeing and help standardize the microenvironment, contributing to research reproducibility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the microenvironment to establish performance standards for mouse husbandry and sanitization, including housing at standard and thermoneutral temperatures. Male C57BL/6J mice were housed singly and in groups in disposable IVCs on α-cellulose or corncob bedding and microenvironmental indicators (ammonia, carbon dioxide) were evaluated. In addition, microbial bioburden tests (ATP and RODAC) were performed on cages and cage accessories on days 0, 7, 14 and, 28 to 30 after cage change. Water testing and aerobic culture of the waterspout of bottles containing chlorinated water were performed to determine acceptable replacement schedules. Ammonia levels remained below the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health 8-h recommended exposure limit for humans (25 ppm) at all time points for all housing conditions through day 21 for group-housed mice, and through day 30 for singly housed mice. Microbial bioburden results for cage accessories and water testing were acceptable up to 28 d after cage change (RODAC less than 50 CFU; ATP less than 100,000 RLU) at both standard and thermoneutral housing temperatures. Mice remained clinically healthy throughout the studies. These results support site operating practices and verify extended sanitization recommendations per the Guide of the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in this disposable IVC environment: group-housed mice receive bottom cage and water bottle change up to every 14 d with full cage change (including lid and accessories) every 28 d, and singly housed mice receive full cage change every 28 to 30 d or sooner.

Molecular-based methods have shown potential for improving pathogen detection and reducing animal use. While increasing evidence supports rodent-free environmental health PCR pathogen detection, limited information is available regarding efficacy for disposable individually ventilated caging systems. In such systems, testing of plenum exhaust air dust is ineffective, and the use of collection media is optimal. We performed a series of studies to compare PCR infectious agent detection with dust collected on media placed in a mouse-free soiled bedding cage, the cage exhaust filter of an occupied sentinel cage, and direct sampling from colony and sentinel mice with traditional soiled bedding mouse sentinels. We hypothesized that after a 3-mo period, testing of filter media agitated in a soiled bedding cage would be equal to or more sensitive than more traditional methods. Agitated media detected Astrovirus-1, segmented filamentous bacteria and Helicobacter ganmani to a degree comparable to testing lid exhaust filter PCR from a sentinel mouse cage, but opportunists such as Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis were not detected consistently, and H. hepaticus was not detected at all. Direct sampling of pooled fecal pellets and body swabs from sentinel mice and testing using PCR also failed to reliably detect opportunists and Helicobacter spp. While further work is needed to refine use of filter media in soiled bedding for detection of lower prevalence opportunists, this report provides evidence that a rodent-free method of reliably detecting murine agents in a disposable individually ventilated cage system with cage-level filtration outperforms direct sampling of soiled bedding sentinel mice.

Routine health monitoring is an integral part of managing SPF rodent colonies. In recent years, rack-level environmental sampling has been introduced as an adjunct method or replacement for exposure of sentinel rodents to soiled bedding. However, rack-level environmental monitoring is not compatible with rodent housing systems that have cage-level filtration. The current study investigated whether exposure of sterile flocked swabs to soiled bedding can be an alternative sampling method for routine health monitoring in mice, thus replacing the use of sentinels in soiled-bedding cages. Flocked swabs were placed in cages containing pooled samples of soiled bedding but no mice; swabs remained there for 90 d, with weekly agitation and biweekly swabbing of the cage floor to mimic the agitation of soiled bedding by sentinel mice and facilitate the collection of dust particles. Fecal samples were collected from both colony and sentinel mice. For environmental samples, exhaust debris was collected from the rack plenum, and dust samples were collected from the exhaust hose. All samples were collected on days 88 through 91 and were tested for multiple pathogens by using real-time PCR assays. To determine the diagnostic agreement of flocked swab sampling with the other methods, we used κ statistics to compare the test results from flocked swabs with those from sentinel feces, exhaust debris, and colony animal feces; we found excellent agreement between the colony feces and the flocked swab methods. The sterile flocked swab method detected all enzootic pathogens in the colonies tested. Results from flocked swab samples had the least agreement with sentinel feces, which also failed to detect the presence of fur mites. This study supports the use of sterile flocked swabs as alternative to using sentinel mice, thus conforming to the guiding principles of replacement and reduction in the use of animals for routine colony health monitoring.

Buprenorphine is commonly used to control postoperative pain in rodents. Short-acting formulations of buprenorphine (bup-HCl) require frequent handling and restraint of animals for appropriate dosing, which can be stressful and confound research outcomes. Ethiqa XR (bup-ER) is an FDA-indexed extended-release buprenorphine formulation that is an alternative to bup-HCl in mice and rats. In the current study, we first evaluated the pharmacokinetics of bup-ER in male C57BL/6J mice by sampling blood at 10 time points, ranging from 30 min to 72 h after administration (n = 3 mice per time point). Average plasma concentrations fell below therapeutic levels at 48 h after administration. We also evaluated the safety of bup-ER when administered prior to surgery in combination with common anesthetics and the efficacy of bup-ER in mouse laparotomy. Anesthetic safety was studied by measuring respiratory rate, rectal temperature, and recovery time in groups of mice (n = 8) given bup-HCl, bup-ER, or saline in combination with isoflurane or ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. No differences were seen between analgesic treatment groups with either of the general anesthetics. To evaluate efficacy, mice (n = 10) were randomly allocated to receive either bup-ER (3.25 mg/kg) once presurgically, bup-HCl (0.1 mg/kg) presurgically and then every 8 h, or saline once before surgery. Mice underwent a sham laparotomy and were assessed for pain based on changes in weight, cageside ethogram, nesting consolidation test, rearing frequency, and nociception to von Frey testing at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Cageside ethogram, rearing frequency, and von Frey testing showed significant differences between bup-ER-treated mice and saline controls in the early postoperative period. No significant effects between treatment groups were seen in daily weights or nesting consolidation scores. This study demonstrates that bup-ER can be safely administered before surgery and provides analgesia for up to 48 h after administration based on pharmacokinetic and behavioral data.