A recent editorial discussed the pending merger of the AALAS Comparative Medicine journal into the Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS), including the rationale supporting the decision and the March 2024 survey results that endorsed this change.31 In that editorial, we also briefly noted that the survey results supported full adoption of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) 2.0 guidelines, and we announced that AALAS journals would fully adopt the guidelines starting on January 1, 2025. The purpose of this editorial is to documentIntroduction
As AALAS prepares to celebrate its long history with special events at the 75th National Meeting later this year, a new feature is beginning in the Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS). Selected articles of interest and importance from a historical perspective are being chosen from past AALAS publications and republished so they can be shared with the contemporary audience. Our Association initially began as the Animal Care Panel, and as the field of laboratory animal science grew and matured, a peer-reviewed journal was eventually established. Later installments in this reprintCommentary
Within an institution’s animal research oversight program, laboratory animal veterinarians occupy mandated roles such as the attending veterinarian and/or veterinary member of the IACUC, but they may also provide clinical services without serving in the attending veterinarian role, or serve as compliance resources.16 As articulated by many individuals over many years, and through personal experience, laboratory animal veterinarians are collectively seen (and see themselves) as advocates for animal health and welfare.16 This animal welfare advocacy role for laboratory animal veterinarians is not unique within the broader veterinary profession, but the definition and scope of animal welfare
American Society of Laboratory Animal Practitioners Position Statement: Definition of Animal Welfare
Animal welfare refers to the state of the animal and assessment of welfare includes consideration of the animal’s health, behavior, and biologic function. Good welfare is a positive state in which there is physical, cognitive, and behavioral well-being, and negative welfare states are minimized to the extent possible. Achieving good welfare includes proper housing, clinical and behavioral management, nutrition, disease management and treatment, responsible care and use, humane handling, and, when necessary, humane euthanasia. It also includes the provision of opportunities to express highly motivated behaviors that promote positive affective states (including social behaviors for social species) and offering animals
Physical restraint of animals may be necessary for experimental, husbandry, or veterinary medical purposes, or to ensure personnel safety. There should be veterinary consultation for any proposed restraint that is more than momentary. As restraint may induce physiologic and behavioral changes, the method of restraint should be chosen to minimize distress to the animal and the duration of restraint used should be the minimum needed to achieve scientific or clinical objectives. Any restraint device should be designed to ensure the safety of the animal and it should be appropriately maintained. Alternatives to physical restraint such as positive reinforcement or other
In the context of animal-based research, endpoints are criteria that serve as the basis for ending an experiment or test. Humane endpoints intend to avoid or minimize research animal pain or distress while still attaining the study objectives. Ideally, a humane endpoint corresponds to an intervention point in a study where the scientific objectives have been met without any associated pain and/or distress. If that is not possible, humane endpoints can still reduce the severity and/or duration of pain and distress experienced by animals. To the greatest extent possible, well-defined criteria for preemptive euthanasia should be advocated as the humane
The American Society of Laboratory Animal Practitioners (ASLAP) endorses the core philosophies of humane animal care and use, as defined in the U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training, the current AVMA Animal Welfare Guiding Principles, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The members of ASLAP appreciate that scientific advancements are made possible by the conscientious use of live animals in research, testing, and teaching. Of equal importance, ASLAP members acknowledge that the use of animals in these endeavors is a privilege that
A variety of fish species have proven instrumental in the investigation of evolution, behavior, ecology, and physiology, among many other fields. Many model systems (e.g., zebrafish, guppies, and three-spined sticklebacks) have been maintained by institutions and have had protocols written with respect to their husbandry. Here we present the protocols we have developed to maintain and breed a variety of Corydoras catfish species, which are native to the tropical Americas. Corydoras species are excellent systems for investigating behavior, ecology, and other topics, and our husbandry protocols would be suitable for nearly every species in the genus. In addition, these protocols are appropriate for a variety of softwater Amazonian species, and we present options for a variety of housing and husbandry conditions. On the whole, we suggest that, in a scientific laboratory setting, the use of remineralized reverse osmosis water is most appropriate and that in context, a single measure, total dissolved solids, can be used to monitor the water chemistry for water introduced to fish enclosures.Abstract
The addition of supplemental diets to laboratory animals, specifically rodents, is a common practice for the provision of additional nutritional support. We set out to investigate whether the use of commercially available supplemental diets during breeding affected fertility rate, litter size, pup health, and pup survival. Genetically modified female breeding mice with a C57BL/6 background were divided into 3 groups (n = 16 per group) that received standard rodent chow alone or standard rodent chow with one of 2 commercially available supplemental diets: Love Mash (Bio-Serv) extruded pellet or Nutra-Gel (Bio-Serv) diet gel. Male and female mice began receiving the supplemental diet 1 wk before being paired with a partner of the same supplemental group. The mice were allowed to breed for 1 wk before separation from the male. The dams were continued on the diet until all pups were weaned. Overall, breeding dams supplemented with the Love Mash diet experienced significantly greater reproductive success rates and pup survivability compared with the standard diet control group. Dams supplemented with either of the 2 supplemental diets supported significantly larger litters compared with the standard diet control group. Furthermore, Love Mash supplemented diet groups produced significantly larger pups compared with the Nutra-Gel supplemented groups. This study demonstrates that supplemental diets given 1 wk before breeding and continued throughout gestation, parturition, and weaning significantly improved reproductive success, increased litter sizes, and supported pup health and survival.Abstract
Improving the effectiveness of mating schemes for large-scale production of mice is an ongoing challenge in animal facilities. Continuous mating, which requires fewer breeding cages than intermittent mating, has traditionally been used to take advantage of postpartum estrus for efficient production. However, the continuous mating scheme lacks flexibility because it cannot immediately accommodate the reduced needs of mice when production levels are high. In this study, we compared reproductive performance, fecal corticosterone metabolite (FCM) level as a stress indicator, and mouse mortality between the continuous trio (CT) and intermittent quad (IQ) mating schemes. The weaning rates in the IQ scheme were higher than those in the CT scheme (98.8% compared with 85.3%). The FCM levels in IQ female breeders were lower during the first 5 d after parturition than those in CT female breeders. The FCM levels in postpartum females housed with 2 adult mice were significantly higher on days 1, 3, and 5 after giving birth than those of females housed alone. This suggests that the presence of cage mates may induce stress responses in postpartum females. Increasing the individual cage area did not reduce the FCM levels of female breeders when accompanied by cage mates after parturition. In addition, the incidence of dystocia and mortality was lower in IQ breeders than in CT breeders. In summary, this breeding trial suggests that compared with the continuous mating scheme, the intermittent mating scheme improves the welfare of postpartum females with normal breeding performance in the C57BL/6JNarl production colony.Abstract
Feed wastage in laboratory mice, also known as chewing or grinding behavior, is problematic for program management and animal welfare. The destruction of pelleted feed without consumption produces a powder accumulation on the cage floor called orts. Ort accumulation disrupts the cage microenvironment and can clog Lixits resulting in flooding. Moreover, added labor adds cost, and cage disruption increases animal stress. Published studies examining the behavior and ways to mitigate it have had inconsistent results, and the cause or causes have not yet been fully identified. The purpose of this study was to identify methods to reduce the development of chewing behavior in laboratory mice. Female Swiss Webster (Tac:SW) mice (n = 144) were randomly assigned to one of 8 groups (12 cages per group) with 2 housing densities (single and pair) and 4 nesting material paradigms. Mice were housed on clean bedding for 8 wk and then soiled bedding for the next 8 wk. Chewing behavior was evaluated by feed weight, cage weight, and feed scores. The addition of a Diamond Twist significantly increased ort production, while nest transfer decreased it but not significantly. Pair housing increased overall orts but not when adjusted for animal number. These results identified potential contributing factors to chewing behavior. However, further research is needed to elucidate the exact causes and solutions.Abstract
Some mice demonstrate excessive food-grinding behaviors in which food pellets are broken down into crumbs (orts). This is considered abnormal behavior and is undesirable in a research environment, as it is thought to potentially be a stereotypic behavior suggestive of a negative welfare state in these animals. Further, food grinding often necessitates more frequent food and bedding changes. Research outcomes may also be affected if investigators do not exclude food losses due to grinding when measuring food consumption. We hypothesized some mice may excessively grind food in part to expend energy and access to a running wheel would contribute to a reduction in food grinding. Total daily food usage (the combined weight of food consumption and ort production) was measured for 40 d in CD-1 mice that exhibited food grinding. Median daily food usage was compared 10 d before, 20 d during, and 10 d after access to a running wheel. Additional cages of similar food-grinding mice that did not have access to a running wheel were monitored during the same period for comparison. A significant reduction in food usage was observed in 8 out of the 20 d in which mice had access to a running wheel compared with controls (P < 0.05). This reduction was significantly less than the median daily food usage before and after the running wheels were available (P < 0.01). Food usage significantly increased sharply in the 3 d following removal of the running wheel compared with controls during the same period (P < 0.05). A positive correlation between relative humidity and median daily food usage was observed (P < 0.05). Despite fluctuations in relative humidity, providing a running wheel effectively reduced excessive food-grinding behavior.Abstract
Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups (n = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; n = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; n = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; n = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.Abstract
Demodex mites are a common ectoparasite in nonlaboratory Mus musculus (mouse) populations. While infrequently reported in laboratory research mice, the prevalence is thought to be as high as 35% of all colonies. Here, we discuss an outbreak of Demodex within an SPF high-barrier vivarium housing laboratory mice first identified through commercial sentinel-free PCR testing. Consequently, in-house PCR-mediated identification of individually infected cages was conducted, and a successful method for eradication of secondary reemergent infection was generated via recurrent testing and empirical 12-wk treatment with 3 mg/kg moxidectin and 13 mg/kg imidacloprid. While we were unable to determine the source of our primary outbreak, the secondary outbreak was traced to nongenetically modified C57B6/J immunocompetent mice, which were capable of harboring subclinical infection below our PCR threshold. Our eventual successful eradication of Demodex confirmed, first, that in-house PCR detection is a cost-effective means of monitoring an outbreak; second, that treatment with 3 mg/kg moxidectin and 13 mg/kg imidacloprid does kill Demodex mites in laboratory mice; and third, that treatment of only PCR-positive mice is an insufficient way to control an outbreak. Taken together, our methodological approach for infestations such as Demodex suggests it is possible to eradicate them but that it requires a thorough, systematic, and aggressive treatment regimen. Moreover, we recommend that all cages derived from infected animals be treated as positive, regardless of PCR positivity, to prevent recurrent and/or persistent infections within an animal colony.Abstract
Improved diagnostic capabilities and a desire to reduce or refine the use of animals as soiled bedding sentinels (SBS) have driven interest in developing the use of PCR-based testing methods, such as exhaust dust testing (EDT), for routine rodent health surveillance. We compared the absolute and quantitative PCR results from EDT filters with SBS mice by routine screening via a panel of 19 infectious agents including agents known to be excluded or present in the colony. In this study, EDT and SBS were compared at days 0, 90, and 180 in 3 facilities (n = 12 rooms) with animals housed on IVC racks (n = 19 double-sided and 23 single-sided racks). All racks were negative for excluded agents (n = 15 agents) during the study. The bacterial agent Helicobacter spp. was consistently detected on EDT filters while less consistently detected via SBS. EDT filters detected Corynebacterium bovis better than SBS in areas where the agent was present. EDT filters and SBS mice tested for murine norovirus (MNV) demonstrated agreement for positive tests by both PCR and serology. For rodent chaphamaparvovirus-1 (RCHPV-1) we compared EDT to urine and feces from SBS. Six cages of SBS were positive for RCHPV-1 by fecal PCR with 5 out of 6 testing positive on urine, while only 3 out of 6 EDT filters tested positive. Since real-time fluorogenic PCR was used for testing, relative PCR copy numbers for each positive finding were evaluated to estimate organism load at the rack level. Copy numbers allowed for further characterization of agent presence within a colony. Furthermore, we compared copy numbers with cage census for MNV and Helicobacter spp., which was positively correlated for EDT testing but not for SBS. Overall, our results demonstrate that EDT’s ability to detect many commonly excluded agents is comparable to or better than SBS.Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing public health threat that arises at the interface between animal, human, and environmental health. Although the pathways promoting the development of AMR are well characterized in human health settings, data within the veterinary medical world are less abundant, particularly from fields focusing on nontraditional species, such as nonhuman primates (NHPs). The purpose of this study was to describe trends in sample submission for bacterial culture, characterize patterns of microbial growth and any changes in AMR and susceptibility over time, and inform best practices for veterinary antimicrobial stewardship in a captively-housed, indoor NHP colony. Electronic health records from the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center were analyzed across a 10-y period using SAS Studio. There was an increasing pattern of sample submissions for culture and susceptibility analyses, with no corresponding increases in resistance to relevant antibiotics for potential zoonotic pathogens, such as Escherichia coli or Shigella species. Trends are suggestive of appropriate antimicrobial stewardship practices that were responsive to the medical needs of Wisconsin National Primate Research Center animals, as well as the needs of the larger research community at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. These findings can inform veterinary professionals working with NHPs and contribute to the growing body of literature surrounding AMR in nontraditional species.Abstract
Buprenorphine hydrochloride (Bup-HCl) is a common injectable opioid analgesic. In ferrets, Bup-HCl must be administered every 8 to 12 h to maintain clinical efficacy. Extended-release analgesics offer multiple advantages, including reduced handling and injection frequency, improved compliance, and increased protection from end-of-dose failure. Although efficacy of extended-release buprenorphine formulations has been demonstrated in other species, their use in the domestic ferret has not been investigated. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of a compounded polymeric formulation of buprenorphine (Bup-ER) and a pharmaceutical-grade, FDA-indexed liposomal suspension (Bup-XR). Two doses each of Bup-ER (0.12 and 0.2 mg/kg) and Bup-XR (0.2 and 0.6 mg/kg SC) were administered to young adult female ferrets and plasma concentrations were measured between 0 and 96 h (n = 4 animals per timepoint). All doses of both drugs achieved therapeutic plasma levels by 30 min. Furthermore, high-dose Bup-XR maintained therapeutic levels for 72 h, followed by high-dose Bup-ER (less than 48 h), low-dose Bup-XR (24 h), and low-dose Bup-ER (less than 24 h). In this study, we also developed a pain scoring system and utilized this to compare analgesic efficacy between single high-dose Bup-XR (0.6 mg/kg SC) and a standard postoperative course of Bup-HCl (0.02 mg/kg SC every 10 to 12 h for 8 doses) after ovariohysterectomy. Ferrets receiving Bup-XR had significantly lower respiratory rate and posture scores in the first 24 h postoperatively than did those that received Bup-HCl and were less likely to react to palpation of the surgical incision. Of note, ferrets that received high-dose Bup-ER had a significantly higher incidence of injection site reactions than ferrets that received Bup-HCl (P = 0.0137). This study demonstrates that a single dose of Bup-XR (0.6 mg/kg SC) is a safe and effective analgesic in female ferrets, with a duration of action up to 72 h and minimal side effects, offering a refinement to analgesia in this species.Abstract
Unique characteristics of the naked mole-rat (NMR) have made it increasingly popular as a laboratory animal model. These rodents are used to study many fields of research including longevity and aging, cancer, circadian rhythm, pain, and metabolism. Currently, the analgesic dosing regimens used in the NMR mirror those used in other rodent species. However, there is no pharmacokinetic (PK) data supporting the use of injectable analgesics in the NMR. Therefore, we conducted 2 independent PK studies to evaluate 2 commonly used analgesics in the NMR: meloxicam (2 mg/kg SC) and buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg SC). In each study, blood was collected at 8 time points after subcutaneous injection of meloxicam or buprenorphine (0 [predose], 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h). Three NMRs were used per time point for a total of 24 animals per PK study. Plasma concentrations of meloxicam were highest between 0.5 and 1 h postinjection. Levels remained above the extrapolated dog and cat therapeutic threshold levels (390 to 911 ng/mL) for at least 24 h. Plasma concentrations of buprenorphine were highest between 0.25 and 0.5 h postinjection. Levels remained above the human therapeutic threshold (1 ng/mL) for up to 21 h. No skin reactions were seen in association with injection of either drug. In summary, these data support dosing meloxicam (2 mg/kg SC) once every 24 h and buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg SC) once every 8 to 12 h in the NMR. Further studies should be performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these drugs by correlating plasma concentrations with postoperative pain assessments.Abstract
Guinea pigs have been integral as models used in biomedical research, making significant contributions to nutritional, auditory, immunologic, and hypersensitivity studies, and necessitating the routine need for sedation in laboratory settings. The ketamine-xylazine (KX) combination has been the standard sedation protocol for decades. However, due to the adverse effects and abuse potential of xylazine, this study explores the possibility of substituting xylazine with midazolam and examines the combined use of midazolam with ketamine and alfaxalone in female laboratory guinea pigs. Our findings indicate that KX facilitates the fastest induction and longest duration of sedation compared with other sedatives, including ketamine-midazolam (KM), which, despite its rapid induction, results in significantly shorter sedation durations. KX also ensures a deeper anesthetic depth and greater odds of loss of withdrawal and inguinal reflexes, in contrast to KM and alfaxalone-midazolam (AM), under which only 15% of the animals lost these reflexes. In terms of cardiopulmonary function, KM led to an increased heart rate attributed to elevated sympathetic activity. All 4 sedative protocols lead to respiratory depression, except KM, which causes minimal reduction. Adverse events varied, with 75% of animals experiencing injection site reactions after KX administration and 67% exhibiting regurgitation post-KM administration. No adverse events were reported for the AM combination, suggesting its safer profile. In conclusion, while KX remains the superior protocol for sedation due to its efficiency, reliability, and minimal impact on physiologic parameters, midazolam is not a preferable alternative to replace xylazine. Its increased sympathetic tone, hyperesthesia, and shorter action duration, coupled with a higher potential for adverse events, limit its suitability to combine with ketamine in guinea pig sedation. However, when midazolam is used in conjunction with safer alternatives like alfaxalone, it presents a viable sedation strategy, emphasizing the need for further research into optimizing sedative combinations for laboratory guinea pigs.Abstract
Mice often undergo painful procedures and surgeries as part of biomedical research protocols. Buprenorphine, a partial μ-opioid receptor agonist and κ receptor antagonist, is commonly used to alleviate the pain associated with such procedures. Due to its pharmacokinetic profile, buprenorphine requires frequent dosing, resulting in handling stress that can impact animal welfare and study data. A long-acting transdermal buprenorphine formulation (LA-bup) was recently approved for use in cats to provide up to 4 d of postoperative analgesia. In this study, we characterized the pharmacokinetics of a single topical dosing of LA-bup in male and female CD-1 mice administered a 0.36-mg or 18-μL topical dose at select time points. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations were evaluated at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h (n = 3 mice/time point) and remained above the purported therapeutic threshold (1 ng/mL) from 1 to 24 h postadministration. Repeated daily dosing at 24 and 48 h demonstrated plasma levels above 1 ng/mL for up to 72 h with minimal accumulation or changes in maximal concentrations over time. Inadvertent transfer of the topical drug to nondosed mice in the same cage was evaluated by measuring plasma buprenorphine concentrations in nondosed mice cohoused with a single-dosed mouse. Male mice did not demonstrate transfer of drug via grooming or interactions, yet 2 out of 26 nondosed female mice had detectable buprenorphine plasma levels indicating a relatively low incidence of cross-ingestion in cohoused female mice. This study demonstrates that LA-bup is a promising analgesic in mice that could be used for tailored analgesia strategies, depending on the surgical model or duration of analgesic therapy.
This corrects the article DOI: In the Materials and Methods section of the article entitled, “Ammonia for Determination of Cage-Change Frequency in Antelope Ground Squirrels (Ammospermophilus leucurus),” published in Vol 63, Issue 3 (May 2024), page 252, the baseline body weight of male animals was reported as 10 ± 8 g. The correct baseline body weight for the male animals is 109 ± 8 g.
RD Moore* Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT Chronic neurobiological studies in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) often involve the implantation of cranial hardware, including headposts, chambers, and screws. However, these animals often exhibit picking behavior around the cranial devices, leading to inflammation, dehiscence, and compromised tissue integrity, which can necessitate early study termination. Current literature on chronic cranial care primarily advocates for topical treatments, which may inadvertently exacerbate picking behavior. To address these challengesAnimal Welfare, Training, and the 3Rs Posters
P100 3D Printed Caps to Protect Chronic Cranial Implants in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)